@KezzaMcDezza shows us why in under 140 characters:

It pisses me off that our HEALTH insurance company brings pizza and coke for a lunch and learn. #thisiswhyyourefat

(link)

Interesting to think about though. Why aren’t they interested in keeping us healthy? Shouldn’t we be granted lots of free preventative care? Won’t they save money since we’ll be paying into insurance that we won’t use?

The medical world has been messed up for a long, long time. Will our band-aid solutions be enough?

(PS - that last part of the quote is a reference to the incredible website This Is Why You Are Fat)

{ 3 comments }

Watch this three minute video of a food artist.

{ 1 comment }

New York City, who has been debating instituting a soda tax, has instead settled on running a shock ad campaign. Observe:

In theory, this seems like a good idea - though in general kids are rebellious and ad campaigns aimed at getting them to not do something aren’t always successful. For example, this study suggests that anti-smoking campaigns are successful when they encourage kids to believe that their friends are taking the ads to heart, while more direct messages fail.

It’s interesting to note that when the government fights against sugar, it’s fighting against artificially low prices that it’s own corn subsidies helped to create. The drinks they fight against are almost exclusively sweetened with various forms of corn syrup. Not only is it spending money to create the problem, it’s now spending money on trying to solve it.

Instead of a tax, why not just kill the corn subsidies (both will have the same effect: raise the cost of soda and generate revenue for the government)?

Google Trends shows us that, from its low point midweek, the number of people googling “soda” increases roughly 20% on Sunday. Why would that happen, any guesses?

This campaign will be a good thing if it actually works - hopefully they’ll play up the indrect social component as mentioned above. For more, check out the NYTimes article that inspired this post.

You have to appreciate how gruesome the fat in the glass is though.

{ 1 comment }

This Naturally Boulder Days Panel featured: Frances Draper, Patrick Rea, and Dr Richard Wobbekind.

Below are my notes from the session.

General Market Outlook

Huge problem: over-leveraged consumer and rising commodity prices (my thought: this will continue to get worse as gas prices rise longterm)

Colorado will be one of the first states to come out of the downturn. Solid population growth, among other reasons.

Natural and Organic Food Industry Outlook

The days of 20% growth are over. Expect 8% annual growth, and plan business models from that.

Only 1% of natural & organic food sales come from online (my thought: 1% is tiny, this market is bound to explode)

Animal supplements is a huge emerging market (who knew?!?)

Takeaway Insights

  1. Natural & Organic will recover
  2. Threats to the supplement industry are real. They need to invest in a little house cleaning now to optimize their operations for the future
  3. Nutrition industry is not internet optimized. Huge opportunity for “mom marketing”
  4. The Product Promise
    • What’s on the label is in the pill
    • What’s on the label is in the pill at the point of purchase
    • What’s on the label is in the pill at the point of purchase and is absorbed efficiently and effectively into the body
    • What’s on the label is in the pill at the point of purchase and is absorbed efficiently and effectively into the body and the food is safe
    • Economic Recovery - Consensus is sometime in 2010

{ 0 comments }

Dr Frederick Kirschenmann’s Naturally Boulder Days keynote was a fascinating talk focusing on the type of forward thinking it will take for us to avoid a total collapse of our current food system.

Below are the notes I took during the talk:

What are turbulent times?

  • The is the end of the industrial era. We need to prepare
  • We’ve been too exploitive & hard on the planet
  • We’ve been operating industrial agriculture as though it’s in a bubble with unlimited resources that isn’t affecting other systems

What do we mean by driving through?

  • Don’t just do what is necessary (traditionally - humankind gets things done through force and violance)
  • Use the civilized/rational heart - really thing things through (without a plan, we end up with things like urban sprawl)

He recommended two books:

What’s happening now and liable to get worse?

  • More unstable climate - our agriculture has become so specialized that it’s susceptible to widespread failures if/when the climate changes
  • Higher energy costs (which our current system is predicated upon)
  • Loss of biodiversity

Random Facts

  • Organic soil retains roughly 5 times as much water as exhausted non-organic soil
  • The 1974 definition of a farm (which is still used today) is: has or “could have had” $1000 in gross sales (my thoughts: outdated laws can drive undesirable behavior - say for example spending more growing corn than you would be able to sell it for, then making up the difference through government subsidies)
  • Only 5.8% of farmers are under 35 years old and most are on the verge of retiring. Where are the young farmers going to come from?

Strategies?

  • Be Bolder - “greening” our current system is a step in the right direction, but it assumes the system is good and just needs to be made more efficient. Actually, the whole system is wrong and unsustainable.
  • Shift from control management to adoptive management (my notes aren’t good enough for me to explain what he meant - can anyone elaborate?)

Even More Interesting Stuff

  • There is a really fascinating example from the coal industry called Jenkins Paradox. He proved that when our systems burned coal more efficiently, coal became cheaper, and then we ended up using it at a much higher rate. So basically, making energy more efficient isn’t the answer since we’ll just adjust our habits to use even more of it than before.
  • A guy in Milwaukee is feeding 10,000 people and generating $500,000 in revenue from a 3 acre urban farm. Dr Kirschenmann related that a typical 3500 acre Iowa farm generates less in revenue (I’ll be writing more about this guy from Milwaukee - my hometown! - in a future post)
  • Will Ellend has prime Iowa real estate, but 3 out of every 5 years - he grows grass and grazes cattle on what is climate-wise the greatest place in the world to grow corn and soybeans

Closing Ideas

Organic and local isn’t good enough. Why? A place like New York City cannot sustain itself from a 150 mile radius. Plus, there would be tens of thousands of ideal farmland going unused in places like the Dakotas and Iowa.

We need to promote the idea of food citizens and blur the line between what is currently a separation between farmers and consumers.

Finally he said: “People often ask me if I am an optimist. The answer is ‘No’ because neither optimism nor pessimism will help us. Hope is the answer.”

My thoughts

This was really a fascinating and motivating speech, amazingly spoken without notes! The biggest takeaway for me was this: making a bad system more efficient only exacerbates the problem.

You’ve probably adopted lots of “green” measures in your life, but are they really fixing the system, or delaying the inevitable collapse?

{ 2 comments }

Copyright 2009, The Reluctant Eater